Natural site: section. 6 palynological samples. Top of the section in the "argiles d'Albens" (Albens clays)
Urban archaeological excavation. 10 palynological samples. "Urban" typical results.
Archaeological excavation. 4 palynological samples: positive. Very forest results: 38% of Tilia pollen.
Archaeological excavation. 2 palynological samples, one very rich.
Archaeological excavation. 6 palynological samples. Only one just positive sample.
Archaeological excavation. 11 palynological samples. Negative or nearly.
Lacustrin achaeological site. Six sub-lakeside drillings (n° 1 à 6). 54 palynological samples. Many levels with very bad conservation pollen (sand levels). Resuming the samples.
Natural site. Drilling. 8 palynological samples. Only 2 positive samples.
Archaeological site. Samplings in an ancient meander. 6 palynological samples; nearly sterile. Approximate geographical coordinates.
Archaeological excavation in entrance of a cave served as a sheepfold. 53 palynological samples + 10 radiocarbon datings. Several series: 1985, 1988, 1994. Only some acceptable samples.
Archaeological excavation. 18 palynological samples + 2 radiocarbon datings. 6 acceptable samples.
Natural site: lake formed in 1442 upstream a natural dam due to a rockslide. Drilling. 16 palynological samples. Opportunities to demonstrate seasonal rhythms.
Archaeological site: stone sarcophagus. 6 palynological samples. Very bad conservation.
Archaeological site: excavation in a ditch. 2 palynological samples. Negative.
Natural site: drilling in an ancient meander of the Rhône river. 17 palynological samples. Site included and completed in the HDR of Emilie Gauthier (2012).
Natural site over the alignment of the A39 motorway; drilling. 88 palynological samples + 2 radiocarbon datings. Samples often difficult to read. Publication CRAS, 1996.
Archaeological excavations. 2 negative palynological samples.
Archaeological site: excavation in a tumulus (VI century BC). 10 palynological samples. Poor.
Archaeological excavation. 2 palynological samples. Very poor.
Archaeological excavation. 25 palynological samples. Very positive results. Very complete report (H. Richard, 1997).
Natural site, drilling. 6 palynological samples. Very bad conservation. Approximate geographical coordinates (village center).
Archaeological excavations. 24 palynological samples divided into 3 series (1992, 2011 et 2015).
Natural site: peat bog and lake. 9 palynological samples. Geographical coordinates in the center of the residual lake.
Urban archaeological excavation. 2 palynological samples. Negative.
Archaeological site: INRAP section. 9 palynological samples. Only one acceptable sample.